Return on Evidence (ROE) scores evidence activities, assets, and portfolios on one scale, so leaders can fund what creates value, redirect what does not, and defend evidence decisions with a clear rationale.
Evidence generation is often funded by argument, seniority, precedent, and urgency, not by a shared measure of value. That makes spend hard to defend internally and harder to optimize across a portfolio.
ROE is not a spreadsheet exercise. It is computed inside EvidenceSync from the same governed evidence record your teams already work in. ROE works because evidence strategy, execution, stakeholder requirements, and downstream outcomes are connected before value is evaluated. In the canonical workflow, ROE is stage 06, Prioritize, and it only carries weight because stages 01 to 05 happened first.
Return on Evidence provides a consistent framework for evaluating evidence investment across activities, assets, and portfolios.
ROE incorporates strategic, scientific, stakeholder, execution, timing, and economic considerations to help teams compare evidence opportunities through a common decision framework.
Because every evidence activity is evaluated under the same rigorous standard, leaders can transparently weigh high-impact investments against the true resource commitment required to deliver them.
Once EvidenceSync identifies a gap and defines a recommended action, ROE helps teams decide whether that action deserves funding, review, deferral, escalation, or retirement. The score makes prioritization explicit instead of political.
The underlying scoring methodology, normalization model, weighting framework, and calibration approach are reviewed with qualified evaluation teams during technical briefings.
Request a technical methodology walkthrough →A focused walkthrough with the team, tailored to your prioritization questions.